NIRP – why it stands for Nihilist Impotence Ruins Pensions

p&p

The Slog interrogates Negative Interest Rates Policy, and concludes it is the most culturally destructive idea yet devised in this, the eight-year vain attempt to save financialised global monetarism from itself.

Bank of England governor Mark Carney rarely gets animated about anything (he knows that just one frown could collapse the Pound) but he suddenly had an attack of vehemence at the last MPC press conference. Asked by one hack whether the committee had discussed a negative interest rate policy, Carney snapped, “No…the bank has no intention of, and no interest in, instituting such a policy”.

Answers don’t come much straighter than that one, because privately Carney has strong views against getting involved in a race to the bottom. But the fact is, more than likely, ECB boss Mario Draghi is going to plunge his pendulum deeper into the eurozone pit in two days time.

And yet, and yet….only last Christmas, Capital Economics had this to say:

‘Given the dubious benefits and possible costs of cutting deposit rates below zero, we still see ECB interest rates remaining on hold for the foreseeable future.’

Well, two month on, the unforeseen future is here. Nirp isn’t new-new: Denmark’s Nationalbank introduced it in July 2012 and the European Central Bank, the Swiss National Bank, Sweden’s Riksbank followed suit. But it was the shock decision of the Bank of Japan to adopt it that put Negative interest rates on the map.

The idea of negative interest rates is reasonable on paper: that they will encourage investment in business, and encourage  consumers to buy its output on credit, because credit has never been cheaper. But as with most monetarist ‘solutions’, Nirp fails to grasp either business psychology or the vital consumer confidence factor…as indeed did QE. Consumption is down because almost everyone is, variously, worried sick about job security, unconvinced by 35 false starts to ‘the recovery’, or impoverished by three decades of gradual wage destruction.

So of course, it won’t work. But what of the collateral damage it might inflict while it’s busy getting nowhere?

One of the best sources for rookie investors and financial commentators is Investopaedia. This is what it has to say about Nirp:

‘While seemingly inconceivable, there may be times when central banks run out of policy options to stimulate the economy and turn to the desperate measure of negative interest rates.’

Investopaedia is not given to hyperbole or exaggeration. So I thought that little opener deserved to be in bold red with added emphases where appropriate. Nirp is something central banks are turning to now, because monetarism as an econo-fiscal approach is philosophically and financially bankrupt. The negative ramifications of it as a policy are myriad; to anyone with a balanced approach to the current economic dilemma, they simply do not justify the risk. Here’s why:
* Developing policies that encourage more borrowing is asking for trouble: not only would that attract subprime customers who become write-offs, banks simply can’t make money on it. Having just spent trillions on QE to cleanse the balance sheets, the central bankers are gaily swanning off to start the whole circus all over again, while removing the bank’s margins as well just for luck.
* Sensible SMEs, on the other hand, don’t want loans at any price: the ECB’s own Bank Lending Survey last October showed conclusively that weak demand for loans was a bigger factor holding back lending than a lack of supply.
* It will thrust even more responsibility on the consumer to drive recovery using credit. This is like injecting the cancer patient with more carcogens in the hope of immunising him.
* More generally, it rewards borrowers and punishes savers. In a civilisation already crumbling under the cost of ageing demography, the fiscal consequence must – even in the medium term – be something too awful for any normal person to even contemplate. Hence the headline to this post: Nihilist Impotence Ruins Pensions.
* Once the gamblers have started tossing into this pot, who’s to say the idea won’t be broadened in one last attempt to win the game? Negative rates charged by a central bank may carry over to deposit accounts and loans, meaning that deposit holders would be charged for parking money in the High Street Branch. Some savers’ life-margins are now so slim, there is every chance they’d see the mattress as a better bet.
* If extended to borrowers as well – and it would have to be, I think – then the goforits will extend mortgages and stretch the inflated housing and other asset bubbles to bursting point. The same stored-up hyperinflation brought on by QE would apply….only more so.
* Far too little real examination of stimulation’s potential for hyperinflation has taken place. The CBs insist that it is not ‘printing money’, but that is an evasion based on terminology: the money used is electronically created in the central bank ledger – which is simply virtual printing. The accountancy of fractional reserve banking started the problem, and it was then exacerbated by QE money creation. Now the situation is to repeated again, only in a different form. Don’t think so? Read this exact transcript that accompanied the BoJ’s Nirp decision:

‘BoJ reserves will climb as the central bank creates electronic ledgers to buy bonds from banks:

  • Banks will receive newly created electronic money by selling those bonds to the central bank
  • These proceeds will then become bank reserves
  • These new bank reserves will then fall under the negative interest rate tier’

 

“Simples!” said Signor Ponzi.

* What happens if apparently strong safe havens – especially the US, but also in Britain under Carney – see huge capital inflows towards what is clearly a better deal? Both the Buck and the Quid will strengthen…a much bigger problem for the BoE than the Fed. We may get dragged into the pit…which is one reason why the Swiss had to adopt Nirp.

* When every major Sovereign on the planet has adopted the madness, what then?

This new scam scheme is no different to all to the preceding zero-sum idiocies foisted upon real economies by the monetaristas and their globalist chums since 2008. It won’t work, but it will be dangerous.

So we’ll do that, then.

Previously at The Slog: Hoisting the speculators onto their oil spike

26 thoughts on “NIRP – why it stands for Nihilist Impotence Ruins Pensions

  1. Pingback: NIRP – why it stands for Nihilist Impotence Ruins Pensions | Machholz's Blog

  2. Here’s the thing . Negative interest rates are a sign that we will have deflation . And deflation is a GOOD thing for the populace , BUT not for TPTB who need inflation in order to keep up with debt repayments . As such we should not worry too much about NIRP , if prices fall just keep your money in the bank even at rates close to zero .
    And in any case , rates have been negative for a while now in the Eurozone .

    Like

  3. All to clear now why the race to a cashless society eh? The under the mattress option will be non-existent. You can imagine them salivating at the thought of having total control of all money.

    Like

  4. Narcotically Induced Reality Postponement:

    Let’s face it, the only way out for the monetarists is to change the meaning of language, which is demonstrably what they are trying to achieve, in the hope that when gravity overcomes depravity the people will be so confused they won’t know who to blame. It’s ambitious, to say the least! What we are witnessing is nothing less than a bold attempt at mass neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) although the balance of scientific evidence reveals NLP to be a largely discredited pseudoscience. Another really great idea from the people who brought you popcorn and Ponzi.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Monty Pyfon. “The Galaxy song”. Hope there is intelligent life in space, because there is bigger all down here.

    Like

  6. It would appear that ultimately, there’ll be 2 options.

    Either, mass destruction followed by mass reconstruction (and a much reduced global population) or; a cashless society under which everybody is compelled to have a smartphone on to which an ‘allowance’ is paid each month – the condition being that the allowance is spent in full on goods and services in that month. Naturally, the ‘elite’ would determine, according to one’s political beliefs, the quantum of that allowance. Those political beliefs would be harvested from internet communications.

    It can’t be too long before we witness insanity in its purest form – or am I the wacko one!

    Those whom the gods wish to destroy …………

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Instead of encouraging banks to lend and businesses to invest, maybe NIRP might cause capital withdrawals and hoarding, in other words: banks runs and a rush for the yellow stuff.

    Like

  8. The only solution to the problem of insoluble debt is a debt jubilee.
    This was known over 3000 years ago in Babylon during the reign of King Hammurabai. His law stated ,’ debts that cannot be paid will not be paid’.
    The bankers refuse to recognise the realities and they will not bite the bullet and reset the system. they are attempting to convert debts into hard assets by means of privatisation and foreclosures.
    Fractional reserve lending is a smokescreen, Banks do not require deposits to make loans. Credit money is created from thin air when they make a loan

    Liked by 1 person

  9. ‘Debts that cannot be paid will not be paid’. Hmm. Perhaps back in those days they had not heard of the concept of an involuntary haircut. See Cyprus as a model. There is also the little concept of inflation, currently (officially) dead but poised to shrink the real value of state and private debts any time soon.

    Like

  10. Having just reacquainted myself with The Pit and the Pendulum, it is indeed a most powerful metaphor for our situation. The EU and the Spanish Inquisition are ideologically interchangeable, and our only chance of salvation seems to lie with the rats, the ultimate survivors, and some sort of popular army. Until that time, we are stuck in the Edgar Allan Poo.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Hieronmusb that’s J Arthur Rank,please try harder, i thought NIRP stood for Nation interest representing people but obviously nirp

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Scrub that.

    Our chief weapons are dismay, ruthless inefficiency, and a fanatical aversion to common sense.

    ghost was right, must try harder ;(

    Liked by 2 people

  13. CornEUcopia: The cornucopia (from Latin corneu copiae) or horn of plenty is a symbol of abundance and nourishment, commonly a large horn-shaped container overflowing with produce, flowers and NUTS.

    Like

  14. If anyone can be bothered to write an up to date evaluation (oxymoron alert) of Daphid Cameldung, an author of short horror stories would be ideal, this might be a working title: The Prat and the Referendum

    Liked by 2 people

  15. I think NIRP is a sensible option for bankers as is holding up a steering wheel that has been disconnected
    as you scream down the motorway., They both let everyone know that you are out of control…

    Like

  16. Central banks can’t dictate negative rates for savers – its retail banks that set deposit rates and hence would make that decision. The high street banks have managed to continually reduce savings rates over the last 7 years without causing savers to revolt but i think they worry negative rates could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. They might try out -0.05% or some such miniscule figure just to guage reaction but much more than that i’m pretty sure people will start to react. Personally i’ve been moving more and more of my savings money into peer to peer lending platforms. More risky, yes but as well as enjoying the significantly better interest rates i feel happy i’m sticking a finger up to the banks.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. In reply to Chris and his 2 options, I think we are well on the way already. A wallet/Surveillance Camera/Mic/geolocation device? Christ what a horror show. Also, why did Microsoft give away Windows 10 for nowt? The most intrusive windows ever by a long way folks say.

    Like

  18. Windows 10 is a mousetrap.
    If you wish to use the Office programs via Windows 10 a regular subscription is required, Previously it was a one-off payment for those programmes.
    You get nowt for nowt from Microsoft.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s