ANALYSIS: Why a gold rush & electronic money would quickly set the élites at each other’s throat


Three corrections into the longest-ever Bull market, there is a sense across the World this Monday morning that investors are simply waiting for the next symptom of crisis to kick off Correction4. The Shanghai index is 3% off overnight, and the European markets are a sea of red: but by the end of the week, it’s perfectly possible that bullish stats will have settled the nerves and made good the losses….until the next time. However, three topics relating to the medium and longer term are gaining traction: the future and fate of gold, the phasing out of paper liquidity, and the obvious signs from the G20 that various factions in the élite are in total disagreement about what to do. The Slog argues that this clash of interests is going to become more obvious and tectonic as events unfold.


The end of gold and the hegemony of plastic

in 2015, central banks purchased 588.4 tonnes of gold bullion. In 2014, they purchased 583.9 tonnes. Mind you, they have been buying it for a long time.

Q4 2015, in fact, was the 20th  quarter in a row when central banks added gold bullion to their reserves. During that year, 20% of all global gold available for sale was hoovered up by central bankers. Were the sector media ownership, that’d be getting close to the point where anti-Trust legislators start getting antsy.

Since Crash1, gold has served several purposes for the CBs:

  • To defend the Dollar by dumping it
  • to keep people in the stock market by dumping it
  • to buy lots of it cheap, and then revalue it later in order to repair the banking system’s black holes….and connected with this
  • to keep on buying it while destroying the value of fiat paper.

This is not what you’d call consistency, but then consistency is the cross borne by those who can’t be arsed to read the data. The process has gone through various stages of opportunism since 2008, but to the best of my ability, the future could look like this:

  • A directionalised gold rush during which – very quickly indeed – the price of gold skyrockets. Bond yields would rise and stock markets would fall, but the scheme would accept that in the light of
  • further loss of faith in CB stimulation plus Nirp, and a shift out of fiat paper causing rapid safe-haven searches and rampant hyperinflation
  • an abrupt, draconian ban on buying gold, alongside the introduction of a small price premium for selling it to ‘the authorities’ aka central banks
  • the use of a Basle 5-style revaluation of gold in terms of bank accounting, aided by
  • hugely discounted offers whereby private banks can buy gold off central banks
  • the rapid and obligatory introduction of ‘gold-backed’ electronic cards on all levels of consumer purchase
  • the raising of lending rates on private electronic bank deposits – to create maximum access to bail-in funds aka confiscation of all privately held cash there – in the event of potential bank failure.

The consequent ruination of the populace after these processes would of course reduce global wage costs by an inestimable amount. But in the eyes of the bean-counters, quants, Wall Street banking firms, élitist governments and other assorted bubble-dwelling members of the 3% De Sade club, that would be one of the biggest plus points of the idea.

“Nonsense,” I hear the apologists cry, “what would be the point of, at a stroke, wiping out the ability of the citizen drones to comsume?”

To which my equally predictable reply would be, “That is exactly the effect of neoliberal economics anyway over the medium term”.

The entire plan is a nonsense that would come unstuck at every staging point imaginable – especially that moment when empty bellies and ragged trousers decide that eating rich people might not be such a bad idea after all.

Divided disloyalties

Something will pop out of left field to change the order of that imagined future, because it always does. But there are three associated problems for the banks at the moment:

  1. They can’t do profitable business as long as Nirp is in play
  2. They won’t be in the clear on their exposure to credit crises until they have another infinitely more valuable asset on board…rather than a bunch of bad loans
  3. Neither they nor the tax authorities will have real control over money (as in private ‘cash’) until it is universally electronic.

This sets up an interesting situation. Perhaps it’s just me being insanely optimistic, but if one looks at the three prongs in the Devil’s trident – banking, government and globalist bourse-fuelled business – then it’s hard not to predict something of a falling-out taking place in the triad.

I know of very few corporates keen on the idea of abandoning cash. The cash economy is useful to multinationals in a variety of ways – getting rid of old stock through ‘informal’ retailing chains, tax evasion among senior staff, bribery cash, increasing real pdi via worker tax evasion and so forth. For reasons of cash preference, Germany would grind to a halt for most payments. The French would simply block the autoroutes. And Italy would collapse because the entire country runs on cash corruption.

Governments, on the other hand – and the Mad Hatters of the eurogroupe in particular – won’t be happy until their tax take is 100% of what’s due; and as it’s clear that the bigwig/corporate evaders are never going to give up their tax havens, we’re going to be the ones asked to cough up. And for the banks, electronic liquidity would mean they had instant access to all citizens’ funds at a stroke…or rather, by pressing a button. Bank runs could be halted by simply blocking all access. What’s being done to Greek consumers would be made 100% effective in a fraction of a second.

It doesn’t end there. Forget tax increases: just collecting it automatically and universally would probably cut first-world global consumption by 5-10%. Politicians would find it very difficult indeed to get reelected. Major global players on every bourse would see their shares collapse. So the price of gold would go up even more….just in time for the central banks to ban buying and selling it among the citizenry.

What’s sauce for the banker and the bureaucrat is not at all tasty for brokers and businesmen. And neither would work for elected legislators.

Clear evidence of tetchiness and strained statements designed to pass the blame around have been evident since 2008. Draghi has pointed out on several occasions that monetary policy “can only do so much if there is no free market reform to go with it”. Yellen at the Fed is getting heat from both the markets and big business Bric colonists about raising rates. Japanese exporters are dismayed by the way negative rates have made the Yen expensive. And whatever Camerlot says, the vast majority of big business leaders are pro Brexit….whereas the Sir Humphreys and the bankers are virulently anti it.

If there is some global conspiracy to turn us all into slaves, then it seems to me inevitable that it will result in some spectacular élite splits.

Bring it on.

13 thoughts on “ANALYSIS: Why a gold rush & electronic money would quickly set the élites at each other’s throat

  1. Strip consumption out of the equation the population is no longer bribed, revolution and revolt follows shortly after and even faster if this consumption is food, energy and housing.

    French revolution the peasants revolted? in essence they could not afford the neccessities of life let alone an iphone!

    Not in favour of Osborne AKA the Greek solution because contracting the economy in such a way you shrink it meaning even more NVE’s and it does not help in any way. In this process good viable businesses perish being sacrificed for the more powerful corporation and guess who holds all the malinvestment, poor customer service, suppressed wage levels.

    THE CORPORATIONS!!! We need small business but politicians are bought and paid for by corporations so effectively you become trapped in this style of economy. Google and Starbucks pay how much in tax? So massive aggressive tax avoidance too.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Meant to add.

    In effect Osbornes cuts do not distinguish between good and bad business and even worse if Osborne because of size and power chooses bad business.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. jdseanjd students loans create money,add to gdp but without taxation can’t ever fully get to the demand side of economics distorting one side of the equation and that adds to bubbles of false values of savings storage assets inflation,which increases the problem not solves the problem
    it has increased and will be increased in amounts and availability again because the economy isn’t able to create economic activity anymore but gdp figures lay claim to the opposite of what is happening


  4. Ah, the old parasite kills its host tale. It is a tale told all throughout history and the couch potatoes/good people of this world have stood by until it’s too late.

    This time though, man has the benefit of creating all those nasty bioweapons and nukes just waiting for the next empire crash.

    There is a reason why Aliens have not contacted us. Earth has been syndicated for viewing across the cosmos. No intelligent life form would touch us with a barge pole.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Pingback: ANALYSIS: Why a gold rush & electronic money would quickly set the élites at each other’s throat | My Blog

  6. Another epic fail for Draghi as the eurozone slides back into deflation, official.
    PBOC lowers reserve requirement ratio again for Chinese banks, official.
    UK consumer credit in January hits second highest level for a decade, official.
    The photo at the top of this post says it all… snake eyes, crap game.


  7. A few more things to throw in the pot to be stirred with that trident:

    1) Rich individuals with political agendas. EG George Soros, Rockefeller frontman, selling “Democracy & Color Revolutions” & delivering chaos, civil wars & Fascism, through his NGOs.

    2) The corporate/Govt owned media. Google: six corporations own US media. BBC is UK Govt controlled & is totally on board with the Bankster/Globalist Govt agenda of depopulation, world domination & de-industrialisation. I know this sounds cookoo, but where else does Austerity lead?

    3) Too many Central Bankers are now useless academics trained in failed quasi-Keynsian style big Govt economics.
    Jim Callaghan realised back in the 70s this no longer works, but…
    The hapless & hopeless Yellen et al at the Fed have had ex Goldman Sachs director Nomi Prins in, to tell them how to get out of the corner they’ve painted themselves into.

    4) Too many Central Banksters are ex Goldman Sachs. These are Darwinian, survival of the fittest, low or no empathy types.
    They have probably swallowed the mucho-hyped lies that the world is overpopulated, resources are finite & that a winnowing of the human race would be a good thing for Gaia, & themselves, of course.

    Book: Merchants of Despair, by Robert Zubrin, a PhD in nuclear engineering.


  8. To get rid of the power elite who use fiat money as a way to stay in power, we will have to get away from paper currency and go to gold. The masses are waking up. Brexit happened.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s