Friday Sketch: FFS markets blokes, stop hiding behind jargon

Have you been jargonated marketwise at this point in time? I address this core value question because, if you respond from too far along the positive dimension, I may not digest from an information standpoint what the f**k you’re on about.

 

This could be an ongoing point at issue if we accept an analysis using the Babel Model of downsides going forward, because employing such a paradigm, one could postulate that no one person knows what the f**k any other separately constituted person is on about.

 

For example, were we to take the Dupont-Chemical meeting of resources as a qualitatively upsized analogy, then the heads-up perception in the attic space might suggest a downside represented filmically as a noir representation of “Frankly lady, you would say that”. But as both sides in the participation set are in accord vis a vis the comfort involved in such critical mass, my carefully considered median coinage of added-value input would be that the outcomes could be either upside or stateside inside-out neck-on-the-block normal.

 

Right now, Chinese infrastructural negativity could interfere severely with the Western celebration of Nativity, even accepting the accepted spectrum of zero offensive acceptable greetings on reinforced paper cards heading P2P on the older age-quartile accepted snail-mail continuum. But we mustn’t set aside the post Black Friday knock-on outwash effect when giving due consideration to the relative rate of sale in the liquidity-aridity syndrome context, with which we are all now painfully familiar.

 

Those of us on the inside track have been looking closely at institutional complexity indices, with specific focus on radial blur in the semi-basement lavatory inventory, and on that basis our conclusion is that there is an artificially induced levelling of the solids downpour intented to disguise an upweighted level of non-chilled anxiety when quantifying the cost of margin-call money-reduction in the latterly depressed OMG sector.

 

World class journalism such as this requires massive investment, and so all those who work at Zero Hedge are requested to give due credit and provide links to The Slog where appropriate.

11 thoughts on “Friday Sketch: FFS markets blokes, stop hiding behind jargon

  1. to me JW economists with their predictions are Always wrong and sound like tipsters at the races who have never got one right. They seem to be paid shed loads to lie constantly. Similar to most in power.

    Like

  2. The specifics specified weren’t specific enough to get the right specifics to the correct specification for our specific needs!
    Economist speak!

    Like

  3. In other news, the operational management of international point-to-point moving of homo sapiens at suitable frequency, timing and without cause to complain about suboptimal connectivity in the air above the NW European skies in the vicinity of a major sprawling conurbation was subjected to a detailed options analysis and subsequent feasibility study, which concluded that of the three options subjected to feasibility considerations, all three were operationally feasible but politically unfeasible, at least in the absence of further environmental feasibility considerations being considered at considerable length in the six months running up to the general consideration of feasibility of feasible candidates to appear to be running the aforementioned sprawling conurbation, one of whose feasible candidates had in previous years stated in unfeasibly blunt language the unfeasibility of him continuing to represent those considering two of the proposed feasible options to be unfeasibly unfeasible as an MP in the sprawling conurbation’s national House for the Representation of the People, whilst also considering it rather less feasible than otherwise that, in the absence of further feasibility studies on the feasible options, that he might become the feasible representative of the citizens of the sprawling conurbation after which he would happily recuse himself from continuing to represent that subsection of citizens of the sprawling conurbation that he has, until now, been happy to represent, particularly concerning the unfeasible nature of two of the feasible options coming to reality…….

    JW failed in his audition to replace Jeremy Hayward in the Cabinet Office…….

    Like

  4. I was about to comment when I was stricken with a bout of upsized analogy; running from one particular to another particular, avoiding deduction, induction, and abduction, I was eventually forced to admit that at least one of the premises or the conclusion is general.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s