ANALYSIS: Why are our ‘special relations’ in New York selling off Sterling?

America’s actions in the currency markets make a nonsense of the Special Relationship – and damn the Coalition’s failure to enact its economic policies

A week ago today, City analysts Hargreaves Lansdowne released the results of a survey they’d done among currency dealers about Sterling’s value outlook for 2011. The forecasts ranged from €1.05 to €1.35, but the majority plumped for a figure over €1.25. This morning (12.30pn BST) it’s at €1.10.4. Not much guidance there, really.

Investors (if you can call the market-movers that any more) are a weird lot. I honestly think that if Italy sank into the Mediterranean tomorrow, followed by Germany spontaneously exploding, the Pound would still fall against the euro. Simply because, yesterday and today, the Greek Parliament passed two laws guaranteeing them enough money until September (laws opposed by 73% of the electorate there) Sterling slid yet again against a currency which, as I’ve been saying for years, might as well be an attraction at Disneyland for all the use it is.

The stock answer given is – by for example thisismoney – ‘This is because of the interest rate gap that has emerged between the UK and European Union. The main European Central Bank refinancing rate is at 1.25% versus the record low 0.5% maintained for more than two years by the Bank of England.’ In the world we inhabit, this makes sense: but on a more rational plane it would be, of course, completely daft: it is the sort of buying strategy that leads one to get into the Zimbabwean Dollar. When the planet was sane, one went into a currency because its economic outlook seemed good. Now it’s become yet another sector where everything is once removed from what really matters.

I can see the rationale: staying ahead of the wave makes mass-trade, lightening-fast broking hugely profitable for those who know what they’re doing. The problem is that they’re doing it for a narrow client base of the very rich, or institutions working for over 55s who were either smart or lucky about the investment pot with which they wound up. The last thing they’re thinking about is the socio-economic downside of what they’re up to….or the likes of us, who just want a level playing field.

Because of the near-derivative nature of currency gambling nowadays, for the smaller investor it becomes crucially important to know what the game is at any point in time. I don’t mean ‘let’s go look for a conspiracy theory about the ECB secretly selling bonds to China which it can then sell to the US’. I mean, what are the criteria being used by those with real power in the sector?

For example, returning to the first paragraph above, I used to think that, come next Spring, Sterling would be over €1.30. But to be honest, in January I thought the euro would be lavatory tissue by now. I was right for a while – but then wrong. The reason is, I took my eye off the game, and when I looked back the players had switched from ice hockey to Gaelic football. The key issue now is to decide what the game is going to be.

The short-term game for traders now is, as thisismoney asserts, that the Pound’s slide is about the interest rates on offer. I think that a good 20% of it also reflects deep pessimism about Britain’s future, but let’s set those normal people aside, and come back to them later. First, the ECB’s game is to use the euro’s investment rate to stop a run on it. The EU’s central bank is also papering the walls with euros, another way of achieving a falsely ‘healthy’ price level. Monsieur Trichet is going to find this increasingly difficult after the next bailout – and impossible after the next one after that, because all his money is going to be spent buying yet more junk and/or supporting member central banks within the eurozone. Ergo, more collapses + an end to the ECB’s quiet ‘QE’ = falling euro. In theory.

Second, Sir Mervyn King at the Bank of England’s game is to cling to Zirp with two overriding aims: to stop his banking system collapsing under a shipload of bad derivative bets and toxic loans; and to ensure that, this time next year, most British homeowners are still in their homes while feeling confident enough to consume. Merv’s problem in all this is that a cheap Pound is ratcheting up inflation, his MPC colleagues are beginning to turn against Zirp, and the UK consumer isn’t showing any confidence at all. Ergo, higher rates + euro meltdown = relative Sterling strength. In theory.

But have I got the games right? What if Trichet’s plan is part of a wicked plot by the Franco-German axis of greed to waste all the taxpayers’ money bailing out peripheral members, and hasten that end by raising rates still more? After which there’ll be a subtle name change from European Union to FrankDeutsches Reich? What if King is playing another sport entirely, called making the EU uncompetitive, and then getting out of it to start afresh with a cheap Pound? That is, let’s face it, the crucial advantage we still have over the eurozone.

Both of those theories have a pleasingly loopy appeal, but very little basis in fact. But you never know.

However, a more significant and evidenced trend is apparent in US/Fed currency actions at the minute. Despite what looks like his innocence of sex charges, Dominic Strauss-Kahn has been surgically removed from events: Geithner now has his gal Christine in the IMF driving seat; and Geithner pulled out all the stops to threaten Armageddon if the Greeks threw off their yoke. This is because US foreign policy towards Europe is to stop the contagion destroying Wall St, while sticking very close to the two nations so obviously running the show….and ensuring no nasty socialists get elected. The last thing the US Fed wants is a panic on the euro that causes a rush towards the Dollar: that would up the real value of America’s debt, and make it even more uncompetitive in world markets. And the quickest way to make the euro look strong is to bomb Sterling….which given the UK is a tiny competitor today, is risk-free

Take a look at this ADVFN chart of Sterling movements from yesterday. Look what happens at 10 am EST, when the NYSE opened:

Humpty-Dumpty had a great fall.

Now go to that ADVFN page again today: exactly the same thing has happened – at 10.00 am, on the button.

The volumes traded were average to slightly above, so whoever sold Pounds in the US  did so bigtime. A number of observers suggest the pound is having difficulty distinguishing itself from the eurozone/Greece fiasco. Others say this is justified, given investor concerns about the vulnerability of UK banks to EU sovereign debt contagion. The huge flaws in this argument are (a) if we’re indistinguishable, why aren’t we going up with the euro? And (b) UK exposure to Greek default is relatively minor.

No, that looks to me like a very steep wall on the chart above: too steep to reflect unmassaged market sentiment alone. Somebody ‘directionalised’ (the new buzz term for manipulated) Sterling in New York yesterday – and again this morning. It doesn’t surprise me, by the way: my guess is that the American elite in general – and Geithner in particular – see us increasingly as a marginalised basket-case. The only thing ‘special’ about our relationship with the US from here on is that the White House and its acolytes will be giving special attention to talking about it – while running discreetly away from it.

But back to the money: is your brain starting to hurt yet? Me too. As I keep on saying, you have to decide what the game is.

Here’s a final explanation which is more straightforward and might just be close to the truth: not only the US Establishment, but also most currency traders, think the UK is finished.

“Public Sector borrowing came in around £7.7 billion in May,” one told me yesterday, “yet again, much higher than the £5.0 billion we were expecting. The Coalition doesn’t have a firm grip on the situation there”.

“Sterling had a bit of a rally recently, after Trichet dropped any mention of further rate rises,” another trader told The Slog, “But then Mervyn King delivered a poor inflation report, and cut the growth forecasts fοr the next two years bigtime. So you have low rates and a flatlining economy. It’s not exactly a come-on, is it?”

What’s interesting in these two comments is that both rates and outlook were putting investors off.

Well, you pays your money and you makes your choice. Personally, I’m thinking about the Yuan at the moment. But what these factors partly show is that, with geopolitics, hedge funds, the Fed, Fort Knox, Trichet, the Chinese and Uncle Tom Cobbleigh playing games at the moment, it’s best to discern the identity of the game before jumping in.

More specifically, the actions of the Americans, and the view of traders, in relation to Sterling suggest very clearly indeed that Camerlot haven’t a clue what they’re doing, or what they’re dealing with.

22 thoughts on “ANALYSIS: Why are our ‘special relations’ in New York selling off Sterling?

  1. I think the central banks in the US, UK, EU are all wanting to devalue, and are in a race to the bottom. Mervyn is smart and has freedom to act. He got a big devaluation in ahead of the US last year, and is getting one in now while he can. He is being economical with the truth in his inflation reports, and doesn’t give a toss for the struggling pensioner.


  2. Interesting post, and one that I believe is probably right.

    I’m not entirely sure I agree on the reasoning
    Theres going to be a war in the Falklands, soon, possibly before the last T45 is in service, definatly before the new Carrier comes online.
    The US DoD is going to lose to the State Department, and the US will at best sell to or cut off both sides.
    Demographics are destiny.

    Win lose or draw, relations between us will collapse.

    That said, it remains the case that the only “inflation” thats pissing me off is petrol, which the government could control via taxation (even just cancelling VAT, easy to do and cuts the price to 1.10ish). The other big one is holidays.
    Yes foods up, so? How much do we really spend on food, I’m actualy a little ashamed that its under 5% of my budget.

    The benefits though are far greater, The small private sector is being gutted, but it would be so much worse if sterling were still at $2, drive it down further to $1.30, counter inflation with tax breaks (which due to the index linking of so much debt, is surprisingly near self financing) and watch the good times roll.


  3. Thanks for the most informative article. Really, really usefull. I have been struggling to get my head around what’s happening to the currencies at the moment.
    The relationship between the pound and the euro has huge bearing for me. My business imports 90% of our product from the UK. Most of my expat customers rely on income based on sterling pensions and investments. Their spending capabilities have been hammered to the point where few remain anymore. So I really keep an eye on it. But recently I don’t get it. I also noticed the two big falls first thing in the morning but couldn’t explain them.
    We have a villa sale due to complete and the business is also up for sale. My beloved is ever so keen to return home and I’ve been worried about the euro crash, so it’s time to leave. Being in Spain, we won’t come out of it well.
    So we’ve been getting all of our money out of the euro as fast as we can back to sterling.
    I’ve been panicking this week, far more than most, over the vote in Greece. Keep having nightmares that I’ll wake up one morning to find the € has crashed and everything we’ve worked for is bloody worthless. Even though I know it’s fundamentally wrong, and not good for the interest of the taxpayer, I’ve been hoping, secretly, that they keep kicking that can down the road for at least another 6 months. Sorry folks.
    Now you tell me, John, that maybe the £ is f**ked as well. Brilliant.
    I’ve been baffled why, even after the two votes passed this week, the euro has strengthened. Surely the markets must see that the stay of execution is only temporary and that it’s certainly going to go tits up at some point. It’ll just be even worse and the debts even bigger.
    I thought that maybe the Chinese saying, this week, that they’d help support the euro might have had something to do with it. However, you think it’s the US. How the bloody hell is the normal guy supposed to predict what to do when dark forces are manipulating things like this.
    So where do you go to ride out the storm before the crash hits? Interesting to see you think the Yuan. Quite a few people on the DT comments think likewise. I was considering Swiss franc or maybe a Scandi currency but i’m really not an expert on these things.
    The only thing I know for certain, these days, is that I clearly know nothing.


  4. The “special relationship” between the US and the UK was only ever that of a pimp to his his girls. Why it was ever thought otherwise always defeated me.
    With regard to the currency (or indeed commodity) markets, the real game can never be discerned-application of logic won’t do it because the public (us) only see what we are allowed to. They are really only pretend markets where the big boys win at the expense of the rest of us.


  5. You are between a rock and a hard place. Any money you thought you had might be trashed at a moments notice. Thinking Swiss franc eh? All paper, all paper. Buy real things your family really needs. Have it delivered, not promised.


  6. I just assumed that the UK needs to buy some infrastructure work overseas at any price to give the camerlot halfwits that are running the circus some credibility.


  7. The government has little leeway on VAT because of EU rules. Remember, the EU takes a cut of our VAT. Even if they wanted to, they could not cut VAT on fuel. The fuel duty is another thing and that could be cut, and probably should be.

    I think JW is right, the impression given by our country is one of complete incompetence in almost everything. Cameron has no room for manoeuvre and has failed to take radical action to change the shape of the UK economy. Right now, it’s not looking good and the £ is at €1.10. Oh, dear…


  8. Actually it beats me why people believe in “the Markets”. Yes Capitalism demands it, but all I can see are people manipulating them left, right and centre.

    The Chinese spotted this long ago and did their best to avoid them; can you blame them?


  9. Anyone who has lived for a few years in the USA knows the truth. UK, yes, where was that now? What’s the currency there? Back in the 1980’s I was shocked on arriving in NYC to find that the WSJ showed on the front page the value of the DM but not the £, which was inside with the other minor currencies. Disconcerting new perspective.


  10. Cheers Paul! ” a moments notice” – nothing like leaving in me in no uncertain terms just how precarious my situation is! But I can’t disagree with you because I know you’re right.
    I was only thinking about the Swiss franc because it isn’t the £ or the € and it may retain it’s value better than the other two. That’s about the extent of my logic on this. I don’t work in the City or finance. I do appreciate you taking the time to reply though, thanks.


  11. I don’t believe the Chinese did avoid the markets-they got in there manipulating with the best of them. Whats more they’ve got a hell of a lot more chips to play with!
    The interesting point is that “we the (US) people” have never had a great love for big capitalism (hence the US anti-trust laws), and it has certainly screwed them of recent years.
    With the likely “drawdown” of US troops from its “empire” in the coming years, will this presage a sea change in the tolerance which has been shown to big capital by “we the people”? Military circuses are fine to placate the people for some time, but eventually they need bread as well.


  12. I’ll tell you why retribution and a warning, just watched “conspiracy files” (bbc 4 wed on i player) an hour on Loose change and the truthers, beautifully presented as an unbiased enquiry on building 7 and the recent report saying it just self combusted and fell down. Trouble was, the loons, the shifty, the obvious, and the bought were all on the home side.
    first time i’ve seen the BBC even recognise these views let alone “endorse” them.

    maybe they got the ok and this is Obama’s plan to stay where he is?
    just a theory, he’s got to look like he’s angry.


  13. Agree 100% with all of that. That’s why it must be destroyed. (The system I mean, not the comment).


  14. Actually it’s called raping a continent. Look carefully at where the Chinese offer help: it is always to pillocks who don’t know what they’re doing, but do have resources – new age minerals and/or cheap labour.
    When China finally comes face to face with Islam in Africa, there’s a very good chance they’ll deal with Islamism for us: they don’t do pc in China.


  15. Pingback: STRAUSS-KAHN: Hell hath no fury like a liberal proved wrong | The Slog

  16. Pingback: CRASH 2: Credit markets already treating Greece as a default | The Slog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s