Diallo’s top attorney Jeffrey Shapiro….off the case

Now DSK is destroyed, Shapiro and Siegel are surplus to requirements.


Legal team representing Diallo has tarnished history

In an explosive development, the maid accusing former IMF boss Dominic Strauss-Kahn of attempted rape has abruptly dropped two of her legal stars. Very quietly two days ago – the event was barely reported at all – helpless and poorly-educated Strauss-Kahn accuser Nafissatou Diallo parted company with top legal attorney Jeffrey Shapiro. Also off the team is prominent civil rights attorney Norman Siegel.

While Shapiro had always said his role was a ‘pro bono’ one of talking to the media, The Slog has never believed the story given out by the Diallo side that the hotshot defence lawyer was “a close family friend”. I don’t know many Manhattan lawyers who hobnob with taxi drivers and hotel maids in the Bronx.

Only two days ago, Shapiro told Salon magazine there was “no way that any aspect of this event could be construed as consensual.” He was still happy to be described then as ‘one of [Diallo’s] lawyers’….yet suddenly on that same day, he wasn’t. Did he too get hold of the DNA ‘evidence’ and spot how shaky it was?

More to the point, since Day One Jeffrey Shapiro has been a key member of the dramatis personnae: every US medium compiling a ‘know your DSK players’ page has featured the case as Brafman v Shapiro.

This is the equivalent of Manchester United severing Wayne Rooney’s contract on the eve of their Champions’ Cup Final. But the Murdoch press has been too busy reporting the gender of his cleaning staff and the colour of Strauss-Kahn’s rooftop umbrellas to spot it.

In fact, the nature and scale of Ms Diallo’s case has been dramatically narrowed. Following Strauss-Kahn’s arraignment two days ago, attorney Kenneth Thompson confirmed the situation, but most observers missed it. The residue team now consists of Thompson himself – and his own little Thompson Wigdor, a two-partner firm that focuses on criminal employment cases.

Some quick research reveals that Thompson Wigdor doesn’t have a squeaky-clean history. Just two weeks ago, the firm was fined $15,000 by U.S. District Judge William Pauley for allowing a client in an employment discrimination case to conceal that she had taken a new job for more money. The salary increase would have been relevant in determining damages awarded the woman. In Britain, we call this ‘withholding evidence’.

Eight days before that, Wigdor represented a woman who was claiming her boss harassed her with topless shots of his wife. Wigdor had compact discs of the photos, and Thompson Wigdor told opposing counsel they would return the photos in exchange for $2.5 million for his client. The boss’ wife then sued the law firm and its client for improperly using the pictures as leverage for a lawsuit. The law firm escaped the suit by claiming attorney-client privilege. In Britain, we call this ‘blackmail’.

The fact that this development has been glossed over by the media suggests to The Slog that they aren’t paying attention here. I raises serious questions, not the least of which are:

1. Shapiro’s abrupt departure suggests a lack of money on Diallo’s side. Fair enough, but was Shapiro fired, or did he find something he didn’t like? His practice wouldn’t return calls last night UK time. Thompson Wigdor refused to comment.

2. Shapiro’s appearance on the horizon in the early days of the case helped make it a big-deal, high profile jamboree. His departure now Strauss-Kahn has been dragged through the mud smacks of something not very nice. One thing I’d like to know, for example, is who asured Shapiro’s initial input? The ‘family friend’ line is risible bollocks.

3. Norman Siegel is also a serious player in the race-discrimination sector of US Law. As there was little in the way of a civil rights dimension to the affair, it seemed odd to have him on the team anyway. Again, one gets a sense here of hullabalou being created – of a media event guaranteed to sink DSK before he got anywhere near a Courtroom. Now that ‘job’ has been satisfactorily completed, Siegel too is history.

4. Do these developments mean that Thompson Wigdor and the Diallo family sense a big-money deal in the offing – a few days in Court featuring equivocal DNA evidence….followed by a bung to help her drop the main charges?

5. Nafissatou Diallo has been under the 24/7 ‘protection’ of the NYPD for the last three weeks; are we being asked to believe they had no hand in this at all?

There is more to come on this…..including a disturbing family link to Sarkozy.

Stay tuned.


  1. So: will DSK be the new president of France? That was my reckoning when the affair first blew up.

    The case against him is weakening, and knowing guys like him, the “chancers” who will try it on for a quickie, there is probably nothing in the rape charges (this time at least). Let’s face it, he is a man, and enjoys his lovemaking. What is more he can by all accounts do it well.

    Why bother raping a chambermaid when all the talk on his floor would have been of “is there any chance of … ” and had there been news, there would have been a queue outside his door.


  2. have there been any changes in the attorneys covering the case in the Manhattan DA’s office? Because if not, I’d rather read coverage of the color of DSK’s umbrella.

    As for the idea that this case became “a big-deal, high profile jamboree” because of some lawyer named Shapiro- well done! Do you have comedy writers or do you think these up yourself?


  3. Well John, point by point:
    1. Yes, there have been DA line-up changes – the head of the ‘hate crime’ unit has been brought in. Hard to see why this is a hate crime. They brought her in when the forensics turned up a big fat zero. Fancy that.
    2. The umbrella colours are red and yellow. This comes to you courtesy of the world’s greatest Australian.
    3. I pointed to Shapiro as having ‘helped’ turn it into a jamboree. Along with perp walks, Rikers Island, unnecessary bail refusals and leaked ‘facts’ by the DA’s office.
    4. I never need writers when trying o be funny. But I suspect you do.

    Now we have a rule in these threads, John: if you can’t argue without resort to insults, you’re out. Take it or leave it.


  4. It’s a smear campaign.

    DSK was doing something somebody had asked him not to do and he ignored them – so the Gypsy’s Warning was delivered. Well, maybe we should call it the ‘Maid’s Warning’ in this case.

    5 gets you 10 that the maid disappears with a nice bung and DSK either ‘retires’ or is inserted in a cushy stipend somewhere like the UN because “nothing was ever proved and charges were dropped.”

    Of course, if he REALLY annoyed someone like the Rothschilds then he’s off to Sing Sing and the ‘evidence’ of his misdeeds will be bomb-proof.


  5. Surely you joke. Even if DSK the case collapses and he gets off scot-free his reputation is in tatters and the case will not be concluded until 2012. As today’s article shows the boys from the left side of the pond have done Sarko’s work and he will beat the delectable Mme. Le Pen and be home free for another 5 years.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s