There could be a seriously First Lady in 2016

The new top bitch at AOL has much to offer America

I was reading a piece about US politics by Toby Harnden in the Telegraph yesterday, on the subject of Republican Presidential candidates for 2012. Mr Harnden was probably a post-World Cup Win baby, and is thus almost certainly unable to see how the idea of Chris Christie for the nomination is akin to a caucus for Sarah Palin’s shotgun.

The way (ever since Reagan somehow made it into the Oval Office) political ‘leaders’ have become successively more unlikely is a running subject for hilarity among Slog friends. But for those aged under 45, I’d imagine Berlusconi is a bit of  lad, Bush was a little on the short side, and Sarkozy hides his profound intellect behind a penchant for vulgar remarks and leggy wannabe pop stars. To my generation, however, these pillocks will simply never pass muster.

But Harnden’s piece led me to thinking about better Prezz candidates, and the Cynical Slither of Slog fell upon Arianna Huffington.

Titter not. She may be rich the first time round via a good divorce lawyer, but this time around, Huffers is $315 million better off entirely through her instinctive online newspaper skills. The lady now finds herself running content for ailing old granny AOL – and she has done it via an editorial policy which (while not pure Democratic Party propaganda) is consistently liberal in an age that has not always been so.

The thing that makes her an interesting package for me is that the Huffpost line isn’t mine at all, but as a web-hack, on discovering it, I felt totally at home with her model of the internet. It is the antithesis of Murdoch paywalls, but equally it isn’t silly fluffy either. ($315million says not at all fluffy.)

I suspect this reflects her life: once a good GOP wife, she then had the independence of thought to change many of her views – but not all of them. And it occurs to me that this mix of central values and willingness to keep an open mind is precisely what any national leader needs. Above all, it’s what the US is going to need more than any other quality from now on.

There are other assets Ms Huffington obviously has. I can’t see her blinking in the face of Beijing, but equally I couldn’t imagine her testosteroning her way into a ill-judged conflict. And being a  woman, she knows how to compromise without becoming compromised. Blokes don’t get this.

She’d be  wasted -and wrong – for 2012: I doubt if any serious Democrat will challenge O’Drama (although somebody should) and anyway Arianna has, shall we say, other commitments like earn-outs and editing to think about.

But Huffington as Democrat/Third Party candidate in 2016 could very well be the right person at the right time.

You know, for once, I could see myself getting excited about an election with her as  serious candidate.

9 thoughts on “There could be a seriously First Lady in 2016

  1. You cannot be serious. The Huff for President? First of all she is Greek and secondly not even the most rabid liberal in the USA comes anywhere near her socialist agenda. Forget it chum.


  2. Dear all of you

    I’m well aware that having a maiden name ending in oponopolopoulis currently rules out the Presidency. But when Schwarzeneggar raised the issue, there was a surprisingly limited amount of opposition to it.

    Believe me, an enormous amount is going to change between now and 2016 – and this woman has some very, very powerful friends. Her candidature is already being floated in some quarters. IF, and that’s a big IF, she turns AOL around, you never know what might happen.


  3. One of the very many problems with socialism is that when it fails to work (as it always does), those responsible for its failure often blame a lack of big govt and statism for that failure.
    Their solution of course is not less socialism but more and there are plenty of true believers in the US to swallow that fraud and vote for it. Time will tell.


  4. “First Lady” does not necessarily just mean wife to the POTUS. It has meant that so far because a woman has never been the POTUS yet. The First Lady’s “husband” could be known as First Spouse.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s