DAVID CAMERON: The head of today’s Britain on the heart of a future Europe, and why an urgent referendum is needed some time in 2017.

EU speech at Bloomberg

Wednesday 23 January 2013

This version of the speech given by David Cameron at Bloomberg is as written not as spoken.

********************

This morning I want to talk about the future of Europe. But as it doesn’t have one, I’ll burble meaninglessly about the past for a bit instead.

Seventy years ago, Europe was being torn apart by bossy Germans, and deserted by a bunch of French chocolate soldiers, but the change from war to peace did not happen like a change in the weather, oh no:  it happened because the Yanks got bombed to f**k at Pearl Harbor, and thus came over to give Fritz a well-deserved bloody conk.

After the Berlin Wall came down, I visited that city, and I will never forget how the abandoned checkpoints gave me a sense of excitement about spending quality time with randy Osti women while scoring some cheap coke. And although we must never take cocaine for granted, the first purpose of the European Union is not to help me sniff cheap lines, but to secure prosperity for we in the elite, in what is going to be a race for the wealth and jobs of the few at the expense of the many: the map of global influence is changing before our eyes. These changes are already being felt by the coffee shops in the Netherlands, Brunhilde in Germany, and the disabled in Britain.

So I want to speak to you today with urgency and frankness about the European Union and how it must change, while cleverly putting off the urgent in favour of keeping the 1922 Committee and UKip happy – because let’s face it, they want to ram a yardbrush right up my arse and as we’ve just redecorated Number Ten, I’m buggered if I’m going to hand it over to that Jewboy who keeps whingeing at me from the other side of the Commons corridor every Wednesday.

Let me set out the spirit in which I approach these issues.

I know that the United Kingdom is always seen by Johnny Foreigner as an argumentative and rather strong-minded member of the family of European nations, but this is merely the character of an island nation – independent, forthright, passionate in defence of our sovereignty, and incapable of remembering that winter happens every year. And because of this sensibility, we come to the European Union with a frame of mind that is more prattish than braindead, because while we know we’d be far better off in the end selling Pringle sweaters to the Chinese, we don’t have the bottle or determination for it, so for us the European Union is a means to an end – most notably, lots of jolly fat pensions for us lot as we can’t afford our own State index-linked jobbies any more.

But all this doesn’t make us somehow un-European, good gracious me no: from Caesar’s legions kicking the crap out of Boadiccea to Wellington kicking the crap out of Napoleon, and then our brave lads walloping the krauts 5-1 in Germany a long time ago, we have helped to write European history, and Europe has helped us to write off ours by subjecting us to membership fees of £130bn per annum.

Over the years, Britain has made her own, unique contribution to Europe: the Frogs witter on endlessly about la perfide Albion and us sinking the fleet their spineless government was going to hand over to Adolf in 1940. But in reality, our national character, our attitude to Europe is about independence and, above all, openness. Let there be no doubt that we are open for business: especially funny business, at which our contemporary heroes Baron Green, Jeremy Hunt and Boris Johnson excel. For we have always been a country that reaches for any handout, and leads the charge of the Light Brigade into the Valley of Death in an entirely futile gesture designed to illustrate the incompetent enthusiasm of those having big ideas many miles behind the front lines.

I do not want us to pull up the drawbridge and retreat from the world and I am not a British isolationist: I just want everyone – you, us and even the bloody Scots – to get a better deal at the expense of the taxpayers. So I speak as the British Prime Minister with a positive vision for the future of the European Union. A future in which Britain wants, and should want, to play a committed and active part in screwing every last citizen into the ground.

There are always voices saying “don’t ask the difficult questions”, but I heed them not, chiefly because there are three major challenges confronting us today and the last thing I want is a bunch of jumped-up oiks poking about and asking awkward questions I haven’t a clue about how to answer.

First, the fiscal problems in the Eurozone are doing my f**king head in. Second, there is a crisis of European competitiveness given that the bolshie workers want everything on a plate with lashings of double cream, especially in France. And third, there is a gap between the EU and its citizens which has grown dramatically in recent years, and it mustn’t be eroded. We all earn far more than they do for doing far less, and if we don’t convince the buggers that this is normal, the danger is that Europe will fail and the British people will drift towards the exit for some reason or other that has been explained to me from time to time but I can’t be arsed with it any more, and I don’t want it to happen. I want the European Union to be a relationship between Britain and the EU that keeps us Establishment Johnnies in the pink, behind closed doors, and well pensioned.

That is why I am here today: to acknowledge the nature of the challenges we face, to identify and analyse them….. and then run as far as possible away from them. Because the future shape of Europe is being forged using hammers and great big furnaces or something, and also a Mickey-Mouse euro that has profound implications for all of us – whether we are in the single currency or not and we are not, and we’re never going to be so up yours Wheelchair Wolfgang, and yet for some reason I can’t recall off the top of my head which is being done in so to speak, we all need the Eurozone to have the right governance and structures to secure a successful currency for the long term because there are some countries within the EU which are doing pretty well eg Germany, although Europe’s share of world output is projected to fall by almost a third in the next two decades and that.

Now it seems to me that the progress in dealing with this conundrum has been far too slow. People like Hermione van Rompuy for instance are increasingly frustrated, and starting to see trouble-makers in the demonstrations on the streets of Athens, Madrid and Rome. We are seeing it in the parliaments of Berlin, Helsinki and the Hague. We are seeing it in the shop windows of Regent Street, and we are seeing this frustration with the EU very dramatically on Sky News and that is a big warning sign.

Let us be clear about this: Europe’s leaders have a duty to hear these concerns. Indeed, we have a duty to act on them. For just as in any emergency you should plan for the aftermath as well as dealing with the present crisis, so too we must plan for the future after the aftermath, and what the world will look like when the difficulties in the Eurozone have become a thing of the past offering no guidance to the aftermath of the future.

The biggest danger to the European Union comes not from those who advocate change, but from those who change advocates in the middle of a case about burning heretics who turned out to have a point. And my point is this: yet more of this bollocks is going to cost me my job, so that is why we need fundamental, far-reaching change.

My vision for a new European Union fit for the 21st Century is built on five principles: competitiveness, flexibility, diversity, cooperation, commitment, power flowing back to Member States, the right balance, nothing being off the table, a bigger and more significant role for national parliaments, and the sort of fairness that means – whatever new arrangements are enacted for the Eurozone – I can sell it to the mad buggers on the 1922 Committee, to the LibDems, and to the pub boors shouting the odds alongside that rather vulgar Nigel Farrago. And yes I know that’s ten principles not five, but I do have my double standards to think about here.

Our participation in the single market, and our ability to avoid most if its bonkers rules, is the principal reason for our membership of the EU. So it is vital for us to protect the integrity and fairness of the single market for all its members, especially us.

However, in Britain quite a few awake people have spotted what an undemocratic, illiberal crock the EU is. In fact, disillusionment with the EU here is at an all time high: Brits see referendums promised – but not delivered. Especially by me. The result is that democratic consent for my Government in Britain is now wafer thin. That is why I am in favour of a referendum, because it will distract attention away from Hackgate, paedophilia, and Jeremy Hunt’s willy being up Rupert Murdoch’s bottom. But it doesn’t commit me to doing it on my watch, because by 2017 I’ll be history anyway.

Some argue that the solution is to hold a straight in-out referendum now. I understand the impatience of wanting to make that choice immediately, but I say to them, “What are you like are you having a laugh or what?”

For a vote today between the status quo and leaving would be an entirely false choice, and leave the Conservative Party split right down the middle.

My strong preference is to enact these changes for the entire EU, not just for Britain, and preferably not before I’m out on the lecture circuit earning the zillions of which I’ve always dreamed. So although it is time for the British people to have their say right now, the time for it will in fact be around 2017. We won’t leave NATO, because it is in our national interest to stay with an alliance that actually has some squaddies in it, and ships that can afford the fuel required to leave harbour. And if I have my way, we won’t leave the EU either, because it is the only chance we have of continuing to wank about without people like me having to genuinely do something.

Hundreds of thousands of British people now take for granted their right to work, live or retire in any other EU country given that life in the UK is so hopelessly sh*t. So we need to weigh up very carefully the consequences of no longer being inside the EU and its single market, and thus not being overrun by Romanian drug gangs street-fighting with Turkish Cypriots.

There will be plenty of time to test all the arguments thoroughly, in favour and against the arrangement we negotiate. The fact is that if you join an organisation like the European Union, there are rules….even though the general French approach is to ignore them, the general Italian approach is to misreport them, and the Brussels approach is to change them according to the prevailing wind.

We should think very carefully before giving that position up. At the end of that debate the British people will decide, and depending on what they decide, we will back them to the hilt. I say to our European partners, frustrated as some of them no doubt are by Britain’s attitude: work with us on this. For an EU without Britain would be like a foot without a verruca, a head without a chicken, and a cross without a City wall.

Let me finish today by saying this. I have no illusions about the scale of the task ahead, because the vision I have outlined will be impossible to achieve: there is no way our partners will co-operate, the British people have set themselves on a path to inevitable exit, and it’s all tits-up. But I refuse to take a defeatist attitude – because with courage and conviction I believe we can deliver a more flexible, adaptable and open European Union in which the interests and ambitions of all its members can be met – up to but not including ours.

Over the coming weeks, months and years, I will not rest until this debate is won. For the future of my country. For the success of the European Union. For the prosperity of our peoples for generations to come. But above all, for the sheer hell of rubbing the French noses in it, and watching the Germans squirm with embarrassment.

Thank you. And now we go over live to Threadneedle Street, where Sir Mervyn Bling is about to launch the next helicopter spraying £100 notes over the rooftops of our ancient banking institutions, in a demonstration of how much more efficient a modern and privatised Father Christmas would be compared to all that Socialist humbug about reindeer, presents for the kiddies, and inappropriately sized chimneys….

48 thoughts on “DAVID CAMERON: The head of today’s Britain on the heart of a future Europe, and why an urgent referendum is needed some time in 2017.

  1. Oh, Cameron to a tee……He is about to usurp Blair, what stunning achievement, who would have thought that possible? But, what about his peers, what do they think? They can’t all be like him, can they? Beggars belief…

  2. “Wheelchair Wolfgang” – inspired! Makes me yearn for satirical programmes onTV. What happened to them now we need them?

    By the way … “I will have no truck with a European superstate. If there are moves to create that dragon I will slay it.”
    Tony Blair reassuring the Sun newspaper, April 1997.

  3. You know, just as you think there couldn’t be anybody worse than, say Blair, Mandleson, Brown, Cameron, Osborne et al, You know what? There is, and always will be..

  4. He might just win himself an election by dangling this carrot out for everyone.

    PS: will the EU even exist in 2017? And will Cameron have died from a coke OD before then?!

    • ‘And will Cameron have died from a coke OD before then?!’
      Oh I wish…No, I don’t mean that, I would rather he live a long life in poverty and deprivation, as death is a release, and he doesn’t deserve an early bath…

      • I always found this lyric particularly appropriate to those who seek to rule… I quite enjoy what I see as ‘prophetic art’……… it encourages the vision of those undeserving discovering what they actually deserve…. and getting it !

        I will turn your face to alabaster,
        When you find your servant is your master.

        Good speech John………… the one which should have been given rather than tosh. Which even those who at first cheered it…….. have started to realise what it actually meant (or stood for)… exactly what was expected…absolutley nothing ! No change, no question, no foresight, no nothing ! All the real thing amounted to was I’ll give you a rigged vote if you give me a shot at the big chair…. on my own this time !

  5. A public debate in London soon ….
    “BOTH BRITAIN AND THE EU WOULD BE HAPPIER IF THEY GOT DIVORCED”
    WEDNESDAY MARCH 20 2013, 6.45PM at CADOGAN HALL, Sloane Square

    • Slightly off topic but certainly figuring in all the current political jiggery-pokery. Rumour has it the world gold council have confirmed that the Chinese are going to back the Yuan with gold. Bye bye petro – dollar. Tin hats on for the rest of us.

      • Yeah right, good luck with that theory….What next, the cow jumping over the moon? Haha, Food, grain, crop, that’s the next reserve currency, we can all live without oil, although some would have you believe you can’t but, you can’t live without food…..All Hail the Great Monsanto…sleep walking into a trap that even the great minds of Brussels cannot even dream of.

      • I have a strong feeling that China will shortly give an update of the sovereign AU holdings that, whilst still a lie and miles under the truth, will dwarf accepted estimates and give Obama and Bernanke a fatal case of the squits.

        Any bets on tonnage? I wager 3000 plus.

      • I was kind of hoping that microwave popcorn would become the new reserve currency. A quick inventory of our pantry reveals that we have a lifetime supply of the stuff.

  6. They spend so much time fudging the facts and putting a spin on everything, it’s bores the ar*e off me just listening to them. I don’t think they would know the truth, as they’re so busy keeping the plates spinning in the air. They have convinced themselves that the public couldn’t deal with the truth, so patronising are they. Little do they realise, that after decades of untruths, if a politician played it straight down the line, we would actually vote for them. Unless, of course, TPTB didn’t cart them off to the ‘funny farm’. (Or do a Dr.Kelly on them.)

  7. I nominate Joanna Lumley to form an alliance with JW to represent the discerning, voting Brits. She’s already proven herself to be a canny politician in her Ghurka campaign. And as she has the added bonus of being rather easy on the eye, JW should be quite chuffed. Win, win!

  8. Well what did we really expect from this poor excuse of a leader?
    What we actually get after months of waiting is can kicking to rival anything from the centre of the EU. How much did it cost for months of speechwriters salaries to come up with that pile of shit?.
    Camoron has actually promised this country nothing, the in/out vote will be after he has renegotiated powers with the EU, after he has been re-elected, neither of those is going to happen and therefore no in/out vote.
    I think we now need to brace ourselves for the long haul. I cannot vote conservative with this tosser in charge, I know that a vote for UKIP will probably mean that labour will be put into power but what the hell else can we do?. Hopefully five years of labour will mean that UKIP will continue to gain strength and eventually we may get some meaningful change into this contaminated political system of ours. We can only hope!

  9. Gottercameldung: our Siegfried will need more than Bolivian marching powder if he is to do battle with the Rhinemaiden and her Hagen, somehow I don’t think his ring was made to withstand that kind of pressure.

  10. In Camerworld, the ‘national interest’ means the interests of the owners of his party, viz. rich, large-businessmen and City financiers. In the real word the ‘national interest’ means the well being of its citizens.

    Once the sugar high of the prospect of a referendum has worn off, people will realise that this is nothing more than a cheap electioneering carrot.

    i.e. ‘Vote for me and I’ll give you a referendum on some unspecified future EU deal to which I smugly assume you will vote yes (after smugly assuming I’ll win the next General Election)’.

    The question remains whether the public’s distaste for things EU is greater than their distaste for the prospect of a Camerlot majority.

    • All of the political party leaders have played the EU referendum game even the hapless Gordon Brown (although in his defence he could probably plead insanity with diminished responsibility and being on strong medication).
      I suspect Cameron is simply trying to spike UKIP who have the potential to cause him enormous damage at the next General Election. As the EU looks very likely to implode anyway (at least in its present form) all of this may be completely unnecessary.

  11. Correct me if I am wrong, but according to the Lisbon Treaty signed after 2014 ant referendums to leave are declared illegal; but I don’t see the MSM or cameron mentioning anything about this particular cause.

  12. Shame you could not cadgole any of your Govt contacts into switching your version of the speech into CaMoron’s autocue yesterday, JW……… that would have made for a much more entertaining day.

    I’m inclined to agree with AEP in the Telegraph this morning….that by 2017 the EU is likely to be in such a different place or to have so utterly destroyed itself financially given the rates of increasing divergance on most fronts, that it will have reached the point where a UK Referendum may be totally un-necessary by then.

    Mebbe our “great leader” is counting on that one too ? ! ;)

      • I cannot for the life of me understand why he did not say – much more clearly and forcibly –
        “Look, the EU is in severe crisis – in order to rescue the Euro it is going to have to federate very quickly – federate fiscally and federate politically. The UK position on Europe has always been to maximise the benefits of a common market NOT to head towards a United States of Europe which is clearly where Germany and France are heading.
        This will become even more obvious as they struggle to save the Euro over the next three or four years. It is they who will be seen to be moving away from us. So where will the non-euro states like Sweden, Denmark, Poland and Britain end up? No-one yet knows. So, we have to start to negotiate our position. Only when we see the shape and structure of the federated states of the Eurozone (or the state of affairs if the Euro collapses) can we put a referendum to the British public.”
        – see easy. Don’t know why he went on waffling (that’s a Belgian thing isn’t it – waffling?). But would it have been enough for the 1922 bunch?

      • “I cannot for the life of me understand why he did not say – much more clearly and forcibly –
        “Look, the EU is screwed; the US is screwed and the UK is screwed, but let me assure you that each of voters will be even more screwed.

        Enough said.””

        Indeed.
        WAD

  13. A commentary in Der Spiegeleisen says … “Instead, Cameron promised a referendum on Britain’s European Union membership after the next general election — if he wins it. The referendum isn’t a replacement for a true strategy on Europe. It merely represents an attempt to shake off a troublesome issue by postponing it to a later date.

    The important questions still haven’t been answered. What exactly does Britain expect of Europe? What laws and regulations does Cameron want to change? What parts of the treaty does he want to opt out of? And above all: How in heaven’s name does Cameron propose to persuade the German chancellor, the French president and all the other European leaders that he should get to pick the raisins from the cake while everyone else gets the crumbs? Britain should remain in the EU, says Cameron, but he doesn’t say under what conditions.”

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/commentary-on-david-camerons-s-pledge-to-hold-eu-referendum-a-879299.html

    • Indeed – but I suspect the public is getting tired of the general fear mongering – I don’t think it’ll work for 5 years; it may just backfire spectacularly if Joe Public realises he’s being actively lied to by the establishment.

  14. Being old enough to have voted in the referendum for membership of the Common Market and preferring to extend our trade links with the Commonweath countries and strengthen out links with EFTA in those far off days I therefore voted against joining. However once we were ‘in’ our fate was sealed.
    However I am very Sceptical regarding Mr Camerons pronouncements, (I am by nature a Camosceptic).
    Of course The EU needs reforming, the overly bureaucratic and over regulatory institutions need amending and the costs need reducing . Any reforms along those lines would be supported by large part of the populace, not just here in the UK, but across Europe.
    My personal feeling is that Camerons main goal will be the abolition of the “Social Chapter”. I recall that some former Tory administration trying to negotiate an opt out.
    Basically this (if successful) will amount to the UK competing with emerging Southern and Eastern economies with respect to wage levels. In other words a race to the bottom for the working masses of the UK.
    The Euro- phobes would have us believe that leaving the EU would be beneficial to the UK economy, but to continue trading with the EU on the same basis as , say Norway, would require us contributing 80% of level of the contributions that we now make as a full member and we would have no input into the decision making. In addition any goods or services that we supply to the EU would have to meet EU standards. So any reason for leaving the EU on the grounds of “red tape” would be ridiculous..(President Hollande is already getting the red carpet ready for firms to re-locate to France if we should cease to be the “Gateway to the EU”.
    So, reform to the EU?.. yes please Mr. Cameron tell us the specifics of your intended reforms, but before you lead us out please let us know the true effects. Not just upon the elite, but upon ordinary Joe Soap.

    • Extremely well put Marty
      I too suspect that the Cameroon’s main reform targets will be around “social chapter” and any business, banking and tax “red-tape” to further enrich his elite chums and further enslave the serfs.

  15. Pingback: EXCLUSIVE: Jimmy Savile on Jimmy Savile | The Slog. 3-D bollocks deconstruction

  16. I was so relieved when Mr. Cameron came down to the nitty gritty toward the end of his speech. Yes, there will be NO referendum if he has anything to do with it. The number of escape clauses for him in his speech would do credit to the slipperiest lawyer.
    I was a bit worried at the start but Mr. Cameron stayed true to his character when all was said and done. My belief remains unshaken that no leader of any of the mainstream parties in Europe will allow a true In-Out referendum to occur!

  17. Eurocrat news types would have the world believe that only the UK Independent Party and “Cameron’s Conservatives are “eurosceptics”. h++p://www.euractiv.com/climate-environment/climate-policy-collateral-damage-news-517292. Don’t count on the “EU” being reformed. They are obstinate types over there in Berlin once they have a “plan”.

  18. Pingback: THE UK & EUROPE: Does Cameron really understand the politics? | The Slog. 3-D bollocks deconstruction

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s