The BSkyB takeover: will Miliband NOW ask a PMQ?

TORIES STUNNED AS ‘NEW TAPES’ ALLEGATION IMPLICATES CAMERON FRIEND REBEKAH BROOKS

News International CEO Rebekah Brooks (Wade)

As the scope of the News International hacking scandal continues to leak, MPs from all Parties were asking last night why the Labour leader Ed Miliband isn’t going for the Conservative jugular. Is this a case of glass houses and stones?

The Slog can reveal that growing evidence of David Cameron’s closeness to senior News International executives is evoking great glee in the Left-leaning media – and enormous consternation in the upper echelons of the Tory Party.

On Friday evening, The Slog dropped in a gossipy tidbit towards the end of its post on Coulson: that the hacking contagion has now infected News International CEO Rebekah Brooks. Late last night, the Guardian beat the pack to the explanation as to why: for this very combative lady may well be up to her leather-neck in phone hacking.

The Guardian yarn concerns ageing hack Ray Chapman, and his alcohol-induced inability to remember what other hacks had asked him to do. ‘A friend’ (unnamed) claims that Ray had hundreds of tapes, and everyone in the Murdoch group is hunting for them. (Note the tense ‘had’, not ‘has’).

The problem with the ‘story’ is that it is without any verification on or off the record. It would be ironic to say the least if Chapman had handed them to Wikileaks, but there is no evidence for this either. But I understand that the tapes do indeed exist…and Ms Brooks has a very explicit role in one or two of them. I’m also told that Ian Edmondson has more or less turned Queen’s evidence on the matter – a good scoop for Guido Fawkes this one.

Throughout yesterday – on both Sky and in The Times – the game plan was painfully clear, and obviously being dictated from the top: play down the wider significance of Coulson’s departure…and diffuse the focus by accusing other papers of having been up to precisely the same thing. This is a continuation of Murdoch’s longer-term strategy: to stick unwaveringly to the One Rogue Hacker line – and when that failed, make pay-offs to any litigants. Already, the second string in that bow has cost Newscorp £2.7 million. Silence, it seems, really is golden.

But the silence has been broken. And the Luvvie Plot to keep on suing the News of the World remains, so people close to it insist, unchanged.

So why do I keep harping on about Ed Miliband – the silent movie? Very simple: this is an open goal for any Opposition leader – literally on a par with the Profumo scandal in 1963 – and goes to the heart of Cabinet, Downing Street, the Met Police, the security services and the bankrolling of an election by a media mogul under suspicion of a string of serious criminal offences.

Miliband’s tactic seems to be to make the whole case a question of David Cameron’s judgement. In reality, it is a question of the possible involvement of the Prime Minister in a plot to pervert the course of justice.

That’s not a wild blogosmear accusation: the Prime Minister was Rebekah Wade’s guest for part of the Christmas period. This was a brief time after the much-maligned Vince Cable was taken off the case involving Murdoch’s acquisition of the rest of BSkyB. James Murdoch’s avowed intent is to get that merger through – and during the General Election, Cameron was accused of having ‘done a deal’ with Newscorp to make it the dominant force in UK broadcasting at the expense of the hated BBC.

The country’s most powerful politician finds himself embroiled in what looks like a grubby deal (with the help of top security cop Andy Hayman) to get support from a mass media Group – in return for covering up an open and shut case of criminal privacy invasion and abuse of press power.

You’re the Opposition Leader under attack for being a wimp. And you decide to stick with ‘it’s a question of the Prime Minister’s judgement’? It doesn’t make sense without further explanation.

I don’t know the full explanation; like others on the case, I have only gossip. But one comment – “the previous lot were up to their necks in it as well” – might serve as a summation of the general view.

Another perhaps more scurrilous observation involved the historical closeness of Lord Mandleson, newly installed City investment strategist, to the Newscorp camp….and the large amount of money he received for the serialisation of his memoirs in The Sunday Times. But I can’t comment on that at all.

Stay tuned.

 

 

20 thoughts on “The BSkyB takeover: will Miliband NOW ask a PMQ?

  1. Not only is the BBC’s monopoly under pressure, but the tax-evading – sorry, efficient,- Guardian group is also threatened by NI’s plans. As you admit at the end of your piece, like everybody else you only have gossip, which is something neither the BBC or the Guardian group would ever indulge in. Bollocks-based bollocks de-construction?

    • Is this irony GOM? If so, how long have you got while I list Guardia Independente bollocks based on three fifith of knob-all?

      At least I admit it and wait for more reliable sources: the Guardia Civile goes with the ‘sources close to’ crap…and three days later, it’s Gospel.

  2. The wet liberal (socialist) Tory Party was a walking (lame) disaster before it even entered office. It’ll prove even more a shambles now it is in power.

    No matter it should hasten the end of the public and business communities complete cynicism and indeed disgust of the body politic.

    Hopefully we can re-buid when it all collapses. Rebuild precisely ‘nothing’ in its place. A free society with free markets (no Govt required) .

    • Actually Chris I’ve seen it.
      I have hordes of Wappings crawling all over the site – but nothing as yet from Sue, Grabbit & Runne.

      The letter is a kite for them to fly. And luckily, I have loyal legals to guide me through it.

  3. I have never read so much unsubstantiated shit stirring as this particular blog. If this is all you are capable of John, keep your mouth firmly shut. If you have any evidence put on the table. At the moment you let your anti Cameron/Murdoch sentiments run your reasoning.

  4. The only rational explanation that comes to mind to explain Red Ed’s silence on this matter is that DC and his pals have plenty of serious dirt on Ed and/or the Labour Party and have let it be known. OTOH there is the possibility that Ed is too busy dreaming of windmills and hasn’t got time to spare.

    btw: I also note that Blair/Brown have called in the police to investigate the possibility that their phones may have been hacked: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12261348
    …and Blair’s spinmeister is gunning for the Met for sidelining the whole investigation.

  5. Some of us have rock solid evidence of Nu Nazi oops I meant New Labour sleeze. Some of us are victims of the Secret Family Torture Chamber Human Trafficking Forced Adoption Courts, and we have all our court papers, letters to and from politicians such as Jack Straw and Lord Falconer ect. The British Bullshit Clones wont come anywhere neat some of us, they dont want to report on any real news, just propaganda

  6. Hmm. ‘Evidence based’ is perhaps a slight exaggeration, shall we say ‘rumour based’ in this situation?
    Substantive point is that the Coalition is drifting badly at the moment and the only barely discernible momentum is in the Labour camp. This whole phone thing, though doubtless real and offering useful scope for gossip, is a distraction from the realities of our tenuous financial situation and the demonstrably urgent need to do something about it. Cameron is without a spin master, though, so we should not expect anything to get done for the moment. We wouldn’t want him to have to think for himself or write speeches, would we?

    • ISTM the importance of the phone hacking scandal is how widespread it is/was, who the victims are, is/was it authorised at high levels of govt, and if so, by who and when, or is it being done by rogue persons in the Media/Security Services.

      We are currently led to believe that victims may only include pols and celebs but if ‘unknown persons’ (including the Security Services) are unlawfully hacking into phones of ordinary folks for surveillance/fishing purposes, it becomes very serious. Unfortunately, if the latter, it will be buried very deeply and no investigation will ever expose it.

  7. “Ray had hundreds of tapes, and everyone in the Murdoch group is hunting for them. (Note the tense ‘had’, not ‘has’).”

    Perhaps “had” is being used as Ray is now drinking with God or that other chap down stairs in the boiler room.

    • Johnny – either Louis is: distressingly agin the concept of free speech; is upset because someone has nicked the jam from his doughnut … or he is one of Rupe’s bestest chums. Or conceivably a blend of all three…

  8. Pingback: Hackgate analysis: why this time the suffix may well be justified. « The Slog

  9. Pingback: HACKGATE DAY 45: A possible reason why Ed Miliband is running scared of Newscorp « The Slog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s