He who asks last laughs loudest


The public interest is the wrong way round: what Blair gets asked is almost more important than what he offers as answers.

In just over an hour, the opportunist who blew the greatest opportunity politics had faced since Clem Attlee faces the famous five of the Chilcot panel. This morning’s papers and websites seem chiefly preoccupied with Blair’s likely responses to the obvious questions; only Michael Mansfield in The Times lays out what this man should be asked. That he does so brilliantly has more than a little to do with his status as a leading QC. (Perhaps one question to ask the current Prime Minister when he pitches up is why there are no QCs on the panel).

My sources suggest that hopes are largely pinned on Sir Roderic Lyne to ‘have a go’ at Anthony Blair QC. Whether Lyne has the skills to wait for Blair to drop his guard and get over-confident (as he usually does sooner or later) remains to be seen. As a diplomat steeped in dealing with the Russians, Lyne probably is our best chance of finding out something substantive today.
The two other things to remember about the Grinning One are that he gets bored very easily, and gives up when it all seems too much of a fag to continue. This plus the man’s innate hubris could give anyone a chance to provoke a revelation.
But I’m not holding my breath.
The Slogger won’t be giving you minute by minute of the exchanges – other more sad people can do that.
But if any external evidence breaks during the Chilcot Inquiry’s gently stroll through the motives of a hollow man, you’ll read about it here first.

One thought on “He who asks last laughs loudest

  1. Before I read your post, and being unaware of the Times article,I had been pondering that the nature of the Iraq enquiry might have been so different if the likes of Michael Mansfield had been appointed as Counsel for the enquiry – funny old world. The set-up of the enquiry means that none of the panel members are adequately focussed. Their questions invariably ramble on for longer than the answers they elicit and there is rarely a follow-up question. The whole effect is more soporific than forensic which, I daresay, is precisely what the government desired. I am not holding my breath for any earth shattering conclusions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s